A single Dunearn Road plot just changed hands for $532,999,999
URA has awarded the Dunearn Road residential site to the top bidder for $532,999,999 — a land rate of $1,625 per square foot per plot ratio (psf ppr), the yardstick Singapore actually quotes land prices in. To see how this one sale sits inside the wider stream of government land being released, start with the bigger picture:
GLS Supply (past decade)
2026: 9,320 homes — about 54% above the decade average of 6,060.
| Year | Confirmed-List homes |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 3,730 |
| 2017 | 5,170 |
| 2018 | 5,410 |
| 2019 | 3,740 |
| 2020 | 3,145 |
| 2021 | 3,605 |
| 2022 | 6,290 |
| 2023 | 9,250 |
| 2024 | 10,500 |
| 2025 | 9,755 |
| 2026 | 9,320 |
GLS Confirmed List · private residential (incl. EC) · URA media releases
Land this expensive doesn't stay abstract. It sets the starting point for what a future buyer pays.
What URA actually awarded
Stripped of the jargon: the government sold a 99-year lease on a plot at Dunearn Road, zoned for homes with shops on the ground floor, to a developer partnership that outbid everyone else. The concrete facts, all from URA's notice:
| Detail | Figure |
|---|---|
| Location | Dunearn Road |
| Allowable use | Residential with commercial at 1st storey |
| Tenure | 99-year lease |
| Site area | 19,045.9 m² |
| Maximum permissible GFA | 30,474 m² |
| Successful tenderer | Winrich Investment Pte. Ltd. and Metrobilt Construction Pte Ltd |
| Tendered price | $532,999,999.00 ($17,490.32 psm of GFA — URA's official land rate) |
| Land rate in market terms | $1,625 psf ppr (award price ÷ maximum GFA, at 10.7639 sq ft per m²) |
| Tender launched | 8 December 2025 |
| Tender closed | 28 April 2026 |
URA did not publish a unit count for the site, so we won't guess at one.
Is $1,625 psf ppr expensive? The last six months of tenders say yes
A land price only means something next to other land prices. The sharpest comparison is the plot directly next door: in July 2025, URA awarded the adjacent Dunearn Road parcel to a CSC Land Group, Sekisui House and Frasers Property consortium for $491.5 million — $1,410 psf ppr. Ten months later, the site beside it has gone for $1,625 psf ppr. That is a 15% repricing of the same stretch of Dunearn Road in under a year. Here is that award alongside every government residential land tender awarded since January 2026, converted to the same yardstick:
Government Land Tenders — psf ppr
Dunearn Road (this site): $1,625 psf ppr — about 4% above the next-richest award on this list.
URA / HDB tender-result releases · psf ppr = award price ÷ max GFA
Prices and maximum GFA are from each site's URA or HDB tender-result release (prices rounded to the nearest $0.1m; adjacent Dunearn parcel: URA pr25-36, awarded 3 July 2025, $491,454,208 at $15,177.24 psm of GFA); psf ppr = award price ÷ maximum GFA, converted at 10.7639 sq ft per m².
Read down the chart and the story tells itself. Dunearn Road is the richest government residential land award of 2026 so far — about 4% above Dover Drive ($1,556 psf ppr), the only other site on the list that shares its residential-with-shops zoning, and about 9% above Holland Plain ($1,491 psf ppr), the geographically closest site on the list, awarded the same month. Every other private site on the list landed between $962 and $1,556, and the two Executive Condominium plots sit in the $700s. For a dearer rate you have to reach back to November 2025, when a Bukit Timah Road site closer to town went for roughly $1,820 psf ppr (haio market data, not from this release).
Why a high land bid tends to set the floor for the homes that follow
Here's the chain that matters to you. A developer who locks $1,625 of land cost into every buildable square foot has to recover it — plus construction, financing and margin — through the sale price of the eventual units. A high winning bid points to a developer who expects to sell well, and it could reset the price benchmark that nearby resale homes are measured against.
If you're a buyer eyeing this stretch, the takeaway is to anchor your expectations to land economics, not to last year's transactions. If you're an existing owner or seller in the area, a new launch priced off this land cost may lift the reference point for your own home — though that's a possibility, not a promise. And note the tenure: this is a 99-year leasehold site, which behaves differently over time from the freehold stock that surrounds much of Dunearn Road.
The breakeven ladder: what the developer likely needs to charge
We can put rough numbers on that chain. These are haio estimates, not the developer's books, and every assumption is stated on each step of the chart and below it:
Breakeven Ladder (haio estimates)
URA award: $532,999,999 ÷ 30,474 m² maximum GFA.
$350–$413 psf: the 3Q2025 quantity-surveyor band intersected with current development-cost references; central $380.
6% of construction cost (typical range 5–7%).
3.5% of land plus construction (typical range 2–5%).
3% of gross development value (typical range 2–4%).
6.5% of total costs (typical range 5–8%).
4% of total development costs (typical range 3–5%).
Central estimate; the band spans $2,387–$2,467 across the construction range.
If the developer prices in a margin
5% developer margin on the central breakeven estimate.
10% developer margin on the central breakeven estimate.
15% developer margin on the central breakeven estimate.
haio estimates — illustrative developer economics built from the stated assumptions, not the developer's books. Percentage costs that scale with the selling price (marketing, legal/statutory, contingency) are solved simultaneously with the breakeven. Actual breakeven moves with design efficiency, financing terms and launch timing.
Assumptions (haio estimates): land at $1,625 psf ppr (URA award, above); construction at $350–$413 psf, central $380 — the 3Q2025 quantity-surveyor band for an above-average-standard condominium ($293–$413 psf) intersected with the $350–$500 psf range in current development-cost references; professional fees at 6% of construction (range 5–7%); financing and interest at 3.5% of land plus construction (range 2–5%); marketing and sales at 3% of gross development value (range 2–4%); legal and statutory soft costs at 6.5% of total costs (range 5–8%); contingency at 4% of total development costs (range 3–5%). The cost shares that scale with the selling price are solved simultaneously with the breakeven — T = [L + C + 0.06C + 0.035(L + C)] ÷ (1 − 0.03 − 0.065 − 0.04) — giving ≈$2,425 psf central (range $2,387–$2,467 across the construction band); saleable area assumed roughly equal to maximum GFA. Margin rungs are applied to the central estimate. Actual breakeven moves with design efficiency, financing terms and launch timing.
What homes around the site already sell for
The ladder only matters against what the neighbourhood actually pays. Within about 1.5 km of the site, twelve condo projects have at least six transactions in the past 12 months (haio market data, not from this release) — here is each one's median, with the ladder's breakeven and margin rungs drawn on the same axis:
Nearby Projects vs the Breakeven Ladder
haio market data — per-project median $ psf across all sale types; distances measured from the GLS site.
haio market data: median transacted price per square foot across all sale types, 12 months to June 2026; projects within ~1.5 km of the GLS site with at least 6 transactions in the window; distances measured from the site.
Notice what clears and what doesn't. Only Royalgreen ($2,730) already transacts above the ladder's +10% rung (≈$2,668). Fourth Avenue Residences — the 99-year-leasehold project closest in profile to what will rise on this site — sits at $2,612: clear of the +5% rung (≈$2,547), short of +10%. Floridian ($2,480) edges past the estimated breakeven itself (≈$2,425), and everything else — from The Nexus at $2,416 down to 1 King Albert Park at $1,874 — trades below it. In plain terms: the neighbourhood already covers the likely launch economics, but only at its priciest end. A launch in the mid-to-high $2,000s psf would still square with the land cost — it would just be asking the area's top price, not its typical one.
The evidence: tenure is the variable buyers most often underprice
Before you stretch for a brand-new 99-year unit, look at how leasehold and freehold returns actually diverge in this part of town over a holding period — this is the gap that doesn't show up on launch day but shows up when you sell:
Freehold vs Leasehold Returns
Freehold / 999yr
not enough data
0 matched pairs
99yr leasehold
not enough data
0 matched pairs
Repeat-sales method · matched buy→sell pairs held >5 years · District 11 · Singapore condos + landed
See district-by-district breakdown and hold-period simulator →
Pair that with the supply picture above. A steady land pipeline can temper how fast prices run, while tenure quietly shapes how much of your purchase you keep when you exit. Both forces are working on this site at once, which is exactly why a single eye-catching bid shouldn't be read on its own.
haio's take
A near-$533 million land bill is a confident signal from a developer — but confidence priced into the land is confidence you'll be asked to pay for at launch. The breakeven ladder says where that likely lands: roughly $2,550–$2,790 psf at typical margins — territory only the priciest condos around the site currently reach. Our view: don't let a headline number set your anchor. Weigh the leasehold tenure, the surrounding freehold market, and the broader supply pipeline before you decide what this corner of Dunearn Road is worth to you.
See how your district compares — pull the freehold-vs-leasehold and price-trend data for this area on haio Market Insights before you make an offer.
